3 items with this tag.
AI assessment scales and similar policies are taxonomies of containment that ask how to protect existing assessment practices from AI, not whether those practices remain fit for purpose. This post argues that they're asking the wrong question, and examines what higher education might be asking instead, with particular implications for health professions education.
Source details Corbin, T., Dawson, P., & Liu, D. (2025). Talk is cheap: why structural assessment changes are needed for a time of GenAI.
AI meeting scribes are increasingly being adopted as productivity tools, automatically transcribing and summarising organisational meetings. But who controls these records, and who benefits from perfect organisational memory? This post explores how AI meeting scribes can entrench existing power dynamics by giving those in authority unprecedented access to communication patterns, informal decision-making, and dissent—all rendered visible and retrievable without those present realising the implications for how organisations are governed.