Tag: academic-integrity
6 items with this tag.
When agents start making decisions that influence outcomes
Two stories about AI agents making their own choices, and a much smaller project of mine that's seeing the same pattern.
A few thoughts on student use of AI
Tim Fawns published a LinkedIn post setting out 17 points about student use of AI, drawing on his experience as a researcher and educator. The points push back on the framing that positions students as cheating or avoiding learning, and ask for a more sophisticated understanding of what's actually happening. I've formatted Tim's LinkedIn post as a one-page PDF for easier sharing.
Talk is cheap: why structural assessment changes are needed for a time of GenAI
Source details Corbin, T., Dawson, P., & Liu, D. (2025). Talk is cheap: why structural assessment changes are needed for a time of GenAI.
Prompt injection
Prompt injection is a technique in which instructions embedded in text cause an AI system to follow them as commands. In education it has appeared as a way of detecting AI use in assessment, which raises questions about authorisation and trust that the technique itself can't answer.
Hidden prompts in assignments: the security theatre of AI detection
Some lecturers now hide prompts in assignment materials so that any AI system reading them adds tell-tale keywords to its output. This post looks at what those tripwires assume about assessment, and why what they detect is carelessness with AI, not the absence of learning. The technique also invites students to turn it on AI marking, and starts an escalation neither side can win. The alternative is to ask what assessment is for when producing the artefact takes seconds.
A bitter lesson for higher education
Rich Sutton's "bitter lesson" from AI research is that general methods using computation beat decades of carefully encoded human expertise. Higher education faces a parallel lesson about AI and assessment validity. Essays, reflective accounts, and other artefacts worked as evidence of learning mainly because they were hard to produce, and detailed briefs and rubrics now read as ready-made prompts for a language model. Handwritten exams, proctoring, and AI use scales all try to make artefacts hard to produce again, when the question worth asking is how we recognise learning at all.