2 items with this tag.
Contemporary discourse surrounding artificial intelligence demonstrates a persistent pattern of defensive positioning, characterised by attempts to identify capabilities that remain exclusively human. This sanctuary strategy creates increasingly fragile distinctions that position human and artificial intelligence as competitors for finite cognitive territory, establishing zero-sum relationships that constrain collaborative possibilities. Through critical analysis of binary thinking frameworks, this essay reveals how defensive approaches inadvertently diminish human agency while failing to address the practical challenges of navigating human-AI relationships. Drawing on ecological systems thinking and cognitive science, the essay reframes human-AI relationships as embedded within complex cognitive ecologies where meaning emerges through interaction. This ecological perspective challenges our investment in human exceptionalism that privilege separation over collaborative participation, revealing how distinctiveness might emerge through sophisticated engagement rather than defensive isolation. The essay introduces taste as a framework for cultivating contextual judgement that transcends binary categorisation while preserving human agency over meaning-making and value determination. Unlike technical literacy that focuses on operational competency, taste development involves iterative experimentation and reflection that enables sophisticated discernment about when, how, and why to engage AI capabilities in service of personally meaningful purposes. This approach transforms the limiting question, What can humans do that AI cannot? toward the more generative inquiry, How might AI help us do more of what we value? The analysis demonstrates how taste development enables abundance-oriented partnerships that expand rather than constrain human possibility through thoughtful technological collaboration. The implications extend beyond individual capability to encompass potential transformations in professional practice, educational approaches, and cultural frameworks for understanding human-technological relationships. By repositioning human agency within collaborative intelligence systems, taste development offers a pathway toward more sophisticated and sustainable approaches to navigating increasingly complex technological landscapes while preserving human authorship over fundamental questions of purpose and meaning.
Health professions education faces a significant challenge: graduates are simultaneously overwhelmed with information yet under-prepared for complex practice environments. Meanwhile, artificial intelligence (AI) tools are being rapidly adopted by students, revealing fundamental gaps in traditional educational approaches. This paper introduces the ACADEMIC framework, a theoretically grounded approach to integrating AI into health professions education (HPE) that shifts focus from assessing outputs to supporting learning processes. Drawing on social constructivism, critical pedagogy, complexity theory, and connectivism, I analysed learning interactions across six dimensions: power dynamics, knowledge representation, agency, contextual influence, identity formation, and temporality. From this comparative analysis emerged seven principles—Augmented dialogue, Critical consciousness, Adaptive expertise development, Dynamic contexts, Emergent curriculum design, Metacognitive development, and Interprofessional Community knowledge building—that guide the integration of AI into HPE. Rather than viewing AI as a tool for efficient content delivery or a threat to academic integrity, the ACADEMIC framework positions AI as a partner in learning that can address longstanding challenges. The framework emphasises that most students are not natural autodidacts and need guidance in learning with AI rather than simply using it to produce better outputs. By reframing the relationship between students and AI, educators can create learning environments that more authentically prepare professionals for the complexity, uncertainty, and collaborative demands of contemporary healthcare practice.